Name |
Sarah Strudwick [1, 2, 3] |
Birth |
Abt 1867 |
Witley, Surrey, England [1, 2, 3] |
Gender |
Female |
Census |
1871 |
Witley, Surrey, England [4] |
|
1871 England
|
Census |
1881 |
Richards Cottages, Acton, Middlesex, England [5] |
|
1881 England
|
Census |
1891 |
71 Upper Berkeley Street, St Marylebone, Middlesex, England [6] |
|
1891 England
|
Occupation |
1891 |
71 Upper Berkeley Street, St Marylebone, Middlesex, England [6] |
Housemaid |
Siblings |
8 siblings |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Alice Strudwick, b. Abt 1876, Fernhurst, Sussex, England d. Mar 1929, Croydon, Surrey, England | |
|
|
Person ID |
I1414 |
Main Tree |
Last Modified |
24 Aug 2017 |
Parent |
James Strudwick, b. Abt 1839, Witley, Surrey, England d. 17 Jan 1882, Compton, Guildford, Surrey, England |
Parent |
Elizabeth Enticknap, b. Abt 1842, Eashing, Surrey, England d. Apr 1912, Brentford, Middlesex, England |
Marriage |
26 Oct 1861 |
St Peter and St Paul, Godalming, Surrey, England [7, 8] |
|
Marriage Register
|
Notes |
- ** I always get suspicious when I see children born to older mothers. In this case Elizabeth would have been 46 which is not impossible but begins to ring alarm bells.
Extra factors that make me suspicious are:
a) the big gap (7 years) between the birth of Percy in 1885 and her previous child, Louise, in 1878, when previous children had arrived at 1 - 2 year intervals.
b) that she has a couple of daughters (Sarah and Mabel) of child bearing age.
Is Percy in fact her grandson?
|
Family ID |
F102 |
Group Sheet | Family Chart |