Print Bookmark

Maria (Bristow)

Female Abt 1836 - 1911


Generations:      Standard    |    Compact    |    Vertical    |    Text    |    Register    |    Tables    |    PDF

Less detail
Generation: 1

  1. 1.  Maria (Bristow) was born about 1836; died between Apr 1901 and Apr 1911.

    Other Events and Attributes:

    • Census: 1881, 46 Fern Street, Tower Hamlets, London, England
    • Census: 1891, 51 Limehouse Causeway, Tower Hamlets, London, England

    Notes:

    Died:
    Maria does not appear on the 1911 Census. Her spouse Benjamin is shown on there as a widower.

    Maria married Benjamin Bristow in Jul 1862 in Hartley Wintney, Hampshire, England. Benjamin (son of Benjamin Bristow and Maria Cripts) was born before 18 Mar 1838 in Shinfield, Berkshire, England; was christened on 18 Mar 1838 in Shinfield, Berkshire, England; died on 01 Mar 1913 in Romford, Essex, England. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

    Children:
    1. 2. George Bristow  Descendancy chart to this point was born about 1863 in Sandhurst, Berkshire, England.
    2. 3. Elizabeth Bristow  Descendancy chart to this point was born about 1868 in Southsea, Hampshire, England.


Generation: 2

  1. 2.  George Bristow Descendancy chart to this point (1.Maria1) was born about 1863 in Sandhurst, Berkshire, England.

    Other Events and Attributes:

    • Census: 1881, 46 Fern Street, Tower Hamlets, London, England

    Family/Spouse: Unknown. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

    Children:
    1. 4. George H Bristow  Descendancy chart to this point was born about 1885 in Limehouse, Tower Hamlets, London, England.

  2. 3.  Elizabeth Bristow Descendancy chart to this point (1.Maria1) was born about 1868 in Southsea, Hampshire, England.

    Other Events and Attributes:

    • Census: 1881, 46 Fern Street, Tower Hamlets, London, England



Generation: 3

  1. 4.  George H Bristow Descendancy chart to this point (2.George2, 1.Maria1) was born about 1885 in Limehouse, Tower Hamlets, London, England.

    Notes:

    George H appears on the 1891 Census as grandson of Benjamin Bristow. I have assigned him as George's son because he is listed as a Bristow and because he shares the same name which was a common practice. But this doesn't mean he necessarily WAS George's son. He could just as easily have been Elizabeth's. She was of child-bearing age and it wouldn't have been the first time that a daughter's pregnancy had been hushed up.

    Paul Barrett 23 Aug 2017